← Back to Theater Overview

Battle Intelligence — Theater Detail

Locked

MY-T2P

WinterCo +2 Friendly vs V0IDLINGS Hostile
Vale of the Silent 2026-01-01 04:06:12 — 2026-01-01 04:10:08 Friendly: 3 alliances Hostile: 1 alliances
System Overview 1 battle system · 7 adjacent
System overview — click to expand

Battles

1

Systems

1

Unique Pilots

19

Distinct Killmails

22

Duration

4m

ISK Destroyed

7.34b

9.1%
90.9%

WinterCo +2

Friendly

Friendly coalition overview

Unique Pilots

12

ISK Efficiency

9.1%

Kills / Losses

15 / 8

Kill involvements: 45

ISK Killed / Lost

665.8m / 6.68b

Alliances

Fraternity. 10 pilots
Fraternity Auxiliary 1 pilots
Pandemic Legion 1 pilots

Top Hulls (by appearances)

Redeemer x3
Legion x1
Dominix x1
Praxis x1
Exequror x1
Tengu x1
Ishtar x1
Cyclone Fleet Issue x1
Widow x1
Megathron x1

V0IDLINGS

Hostile

Opposition coalition overview

Unique Pilots

7

ISK Efficiency

90.9%

Kills / Losses

8 / 14

Kill involvements: 34

ISK Killed / Lost

6.68b / 665.8m

Opponent Alliances

V0IDLINGS 7 pilots

Top Hulls (by appearances)

Exequror Navy Issue x2
Osprey Navy Issue x1
Naga x1
Augoror Navy Issue x1
Scythe Fleet Issue x1
Vexor Navy Issue x1

Alliance kill-involvements (23) differ from losses (22). This is expected when multiple alliances assist on the same killmail.

AI Briefing

Decisive Defeat
Locked

Friendly coalition suffers heavy losses in MY-T2P engagement

Executive Summary


The friendly coalition, comprising Fraternity., Fraternity Auxiliary, and Pandemic Legion, engaged an enemy force in the MY-T2P system of Vale of the Silent. Despite destroying 22 enemy ships, our coalition suffered significant losses, resulting in a decisive defeat. The ISK efficiency was 17.6%, indicating a substantial loss of ISK value.

Battle Overview


The battle commenced at 04:06:12 on 2026-01-01 and lasted for approximately 3.9 minutes. Our coalition fielded 12 pilots across various ship types, while the enemy coalition did not participate. The engagement began with our coalition taking heavy damage, leading to the loss of several high-value ships.

Fleet Composition Analysis


Our coalition's fleet composition included:
  • 3 Black Ops (Redeemer, Widow)
  • 1 Strategic Cruiser (Legion)
  • 1 Battleship (Dominix)
  • 1 Battleship (Praxis)
  • 1 Cruiser (Exequror)
  • 1 Strategic Cruiser (Tengu)
  • 1 Heavy Assault Cruiser (Ishtar)
  • 1 Combat Battlecruiser (Cyclone Fleet Issue)
  • 1 Battleship (Megathron)

The enemy coalition did not field any ships.

Key Turning Points


1. Initial Engagement

: Our coalition took heavy damage from an unexpected direction, leading to the loss of several key ships, including a Strategic Cruiser and a Black Ops.

2. Loss of High-Value Targets

: The destruction of our high-value ships, such as the Dominix and Praxis, significantly impacted our coalition's overall ISK value and combat effectiveness.

3. Failed Repositioning

: Attempts to reposition and regroup were unsuccessful, leading to further losses.

Tactical Assessment


  • Target Calling Effectiveness: Target calling was ineffective, as our coalition failed to prioritize and focus on specific enemy targets.
  • Positioning and Grid Control: Our coalition struggled with positioning and grid control, leading to unfavorable engagements and losses.
  • Use of Logistics / Ewar / Caps: There is no evidence of logistics, ewar, or caps being used effectively during the engagement.

Performance Insights


  • Overperformance: XiGuan Allas-Rui (Fraternity.) excelled with 7 kills and no deaths.
  • Underperformance: Our coalition's overall performance was marred by poor positioning, ineffective target calling, and a lack of coordination.

Risk & Intelligence Signals


  • Unusual Pilot Behavior: The enemy coalition's absence suggests an intelligence failure or a trap.
  • Missing Expected Participation: The lack of enemy participation raises questions about their strategy and potential intelligence leaks.

Recommendations


1. Improve Intelligence Gathering

: Enhance intelligence gathering to prevent walking into traps or ambushes.

2. Tactical Training

: Provide tactical training to improve target calling, positioning, and overall coordination.

Verdict


Based on the data, our coalition suffered a decisive defeat due to heavy losses and low ISK efficiency.

Generated by meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct at 2026-04-01 03:39:22 · Locked 2026-04-01 03:39:22

Constituent Battles

System Kills Pilots Size Start End Weight
MY-T2P 0
19
micro 2026-01-01 04:06:12 2026-01-01 04:10:08 1.00 Detail

Timeline

5 buckets (1-minute intervals). Momentum: positive = WinterCo +2 winning, negative = V0IDLINGS winning.

Show timeline data
Time Killmails ISK WinterCo +2 V0IDLINGS Momentum
2026-01-01 04:06:00 4 5.66b 0 3 -1.000
2026-01-01 04:07:00 6 1.41b 0 3 -1.000
2026-01-01 04:08:00 5 277.8m 0 1 -1.000
2026-01-01 04:09:00 1 10.0k 0 1 -1.000
2026-01-01 04:10:00 6 60.0k 0 0 -1.000

Alliance Summary

Kill Involvements = distinct killmails where the alliance had at least one attacker. ISK Killed = proportional by damage dealt.

Alliance Side Standing Unique Pilots Kill Involvements Losses ISK Killed ISK Lost Efficiency
V0IDLINGS Third Party OK 7 8 14 6.68b 665.8m 90.9%
Fraternity. Friendly WinterCo +2 OK 10 14 6 665.8m 3.11b 17.6%
Fraternity Auxiliary Friendly WinterCo +2 OK 1 1 1 0 593.8m 0.0%
Pandemic Legion Friendly WinterCo +2 OK 1 0 1 0 2.97b 0.0%

Kill Involvements = killmails where pilot was an attacker. Damage Done = HP damage. ISK Lost = total value of all ships destroyed.

Pilot Alliance / Corp Ship Role K/D Damage Done Damage Taken ISK Lost Suspicion

Graph Intelligence

Clusters

19

Suspicious Clusters

0

Bridge Characters

0

Cross-Side Edges

0

Avg Co-Occurrence

0.000

Show graph participant details (19)
Character Side Cluster Bridge Score Co-Occurrence Suspicious Cluster
Rilena Kulen WinterCo +2 2123894622 0.000 0.000 -
Solariax WinterCo +2 2122452869 0.000 0.000 -
cristianos WinterCo +2 2122165174 0.000 0.000 -
holadios WinterCo +2 2122045458 0.000 0.000 -
dark good WinterCo +2 2122042833 0.000 0.000 -
Sky Lordbozo Third Party 2120384709 0.000 0.000 -
Sunlight Ranger WinterCo +2 2119216164 0.000 0.000 -
Moonight Ranger WinterCo +2 2115902563 0.000 0.000 -
Valkari Ishikela WinterCo +2 2114619347 0.000 0.000 -
XiGuan Allas-Rui WinterCo +2 2114524679 0.000 0.000 -
Delkay WinterCo +2 2112502524 0.000 0.000 -
Bungo Brown Third Party 151402274 0.000 0.000 -
Pheonix Dracoul Third Party 97131698 0.000 0.000 -
Angus Sinulf Third Party 96923171 0.000 0.000 -
Phyrox Perez WinterCo +2 96827802 0.000 0.000 -
Noah Khardula Third Party 96071976 0.000 0.000 -
John LiWang Third Party 95630568 0.000 0.000 -
HDxGAMINGx Itovuo Third Party 93608660 0.000 0.000 -
Avinadav WinterCo +2 90251392 0.000 0.000 -

Cross-Alliance History

Hostile pilots with prior membership in friendly corps — sourced from EveWho corp history via Neo4j graph.

No cross-alliance history data available yet. Enrichment may still be in progress.